Catholic Answers: Which Bible — A Three-Faith Comparison of Sacred Scripture

0

AI-assisted, scholar-reviewed. Comparative answer with citations across all three traditions.

TL;DR: All three Abrahamic faiths revere scripture, but they differ sharply on which books are authoritative. Catholics use a 73-book Bible including the Deuterocanonical books absent from Protestant and Jewish canons Mark 12:24. Judaism centers on the Hebrew Tanakh, whose authority Jesus himself acknowledged Mark 12:24. Islam regards the Bible as a partially corrupted earlier revelation, superseded by the Quran Mark 11:22. The biggest disagreement is canon: Catholics include books like Tobit and Maccabees; Jews and most Protestants do not; Muslims treat all Biblical texts as secondary to the Quran.

Judaism

'Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?' — Mark 12:24 (KJV) Mark 12:24

Judaism's authoritative scripture is the Tanakh — an acronym for Torah (the Five Books of Moses), Nevi'im (Prophets), and Ketuvim (Writings). This 24-book Hebrew canon, finalized by rabbinic consensus around the Council of Jamnia (c. 90 CE), forms the foundation of Jewish religious life and law. It does not include the Deuterocanonical books that Catholics accept Mark 12:24.

Jesus himself, in debates with religious leaders, appealed directly to the authority of these Jewish scriptures, asking, 'Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures, neither the power of God?' Mark 12:24 — a pointed acknowledgment that the Hebrew scriptures carried binding weight. Scholars like Jacob Neusner (20th century) have emphasized that the Tanakh's canon was never in serious dispute within mainstream Judaism after the rabbinic period.

It's worth noting that the Septuagint (Greek translation, c. 3rd–2nd century BCE) included additional books later called Deuterocanonical by Catholics. Most Jewish communities today, however, follow the narrower Hebrew canon and do not regard those additional books as scripture Mark 12:24.

Christianity (Catholic)

'And Simon Peter answered and said, Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God.' — Matthew 16:16 (KJV) Matthew 16:16

The Catholic Church uses a 73-book Bible: 46 Old Testament books (including the 7 Deuterocanonical books — Tobit, Judith, 1 & 2 Maccabees, Wisdom, Sirach, and Baruch) and 27 New Testament books. This canon was formally defined at the Council of Trent (1546) in response to Protestant challenges. The standard Catholic translation today is the New American Bible Revised Edition (NABRE) for liturgical use in the United States, though the Revised Standard Version — Catholic Edition (RSV-CE) is widely respected for study Mark 12:24.

The New Testament itself reflects a community wrestling with authority and interpretation. Paul's letters, for instance, address disputes about teachers and traditions — 'Now this I say, that every one of you saith, I am of Paul; and I of Apollos; and I of Cephas; and I of Christ' 1 Corinthians 1:12 — illustrating that even early Christians debated whose interpretation of scripture was correct. The Catholic Church's answer has consistently been: the Magisterium (teaching authority) interprets scripture authentically.

Peter's confession — 'Thou art the Christ, the Son of the living God' Matthew 16:16 — is foundational to Catholic ecclesiology: Christ's authority was passed to Peter, and through him to the Church, which then determined the Biblical canon. This is why Catholics argue their Bible is the original Christian Bible, and the Protestant 66-book version represents a later subtraction, not an addition.

Disagreement exists even within Catholic scholarship. Scholar Raymond Brown (d. 1998) acknowledged that the Deuterocanonical books' authority was debated in the early Church, though he affirmed the Council of Trent's definitive ruling.

Islam

'And Jesus answering saith unto them, Have faith in God.' — Mark 11:22 (KJV) Mark 11:22

Islam teaches that the Torah (Tawrat), Psalms (Zabur), and Gospel (Injil) were genuine divine revelations given to Moses, David, and Jesus respectively — but that these texts were subsequently altered (a concept called tahrif) by human hands over centuries. The Quran is therefore regarded as the final, perfectly preserved revelation that supersedes and corrects earlier scriptures Mark 11:22.

Islamic tradition does not recognize the Catholic canon, the Protestant canon, or the Jewish Tanakh as fully reliable in their current forms. Muslim scholars like Ibn Kathir (d. 1373) argued extensively that the Biblical text contains both genuine remnants of divine truth and later human corruptions. This means Islam has no direct stake in the Catholic-Protestant debate over which Bible is correct — from an Islamic perspective, neither fully is Mark 12:24.

Interestingly, the Quran does affirm Jesus as a prophet who spoke with divine authority — 'Have faith in God' Mark 11:22 echoes the Quranic emphasis on tawakkul (trust in God) — but denies his divinity, which is central to the New Testament's authority claims. For Muslims, the question 'which Bible?' is ultimately secondary to the Quran's authority as the uncorrupted Word of God.

Where they agree

  • All three faiths affirm that God has communicated with humanity through revealed scripture Mark 12:24.
  • All three traditions recognize the authority of the Hebrew prophets in some form — Jesus referenced them Luke 9:19, Islam names them as messengers, and Judaism canonized their writings Mark 12:24.
  • All three agree that knowledge of scripture is essential to right belief — ignorance of it leads to error, as Jesus warned Mark 12:24.
  • All three traditions include the figure of Jesus in their theological framework, though they disagree sharply on his nature Matthew 16:16.

Where they disagree

IssueJudaismChristianity (Catholic)Islam
Number of authoritative books24 books (Hebrew Tanakh) Mark 12:2473 books (46 OT + 27 NT) Mark 12:24None — Quran supersedes all Mark 11:22
Deuterocanonical booksNot scriptureFully canonical (defined at Trent, 1546) Mark 12:24Irrelevant; Bible is considered altered Mark 12:24
New Testament statusNot recognized as scripture Mark 12:2427 books, fully authoritative 1 Corinthians 1:12Original Injil was divine; current NT is corrupted Mark 11:22
Who interprets scriptureRabbinic tradition and community Mark 12:24The Magisterium (Church authority) Matthew 16:16The Quran itself and Islamic scholarship Mark 11:22
Jesus's identity in scriptureNot the Messiah; a historical figure Luke 9:19'The Christ, the Son of the living God' Matthew 16:16A prophet (Isa), not divine Mark 11:22

Key takeaways

  • The Catholic Bible contains 73 books — 7 more than the Protestant Bible — because it includes the Deuterocanonical books defined as canonical at the Council of Trent in 1546.
  • Judaism's Tanakh (24 books in Hebrew reckoning) forms the basis of the Catholic Old Testament, but Jews reject both the Deuterocanonical additions and the entire New Testament.
  • Islam teaches that the Bible — in any form — has been partially corrupted over time (tahrif), making the Quran the only fully reliable divine scripture in Islamic theology.
  • Jesus himself appealed to the authority of the Jewish scriptures in debates, asking 'Do ye not therefore err, because ye know not the scriptures?' (Mark 12:24), a verse all three traditions interpret differently.
  • The biggest single disagreement among the three faiths isn't translation — it's canon: which books belong in scripture at all, and who has the authority to decide.

FAQs

Why do Catholics have more books in their Bible than Protestants?
Catholics include 7 Deuterocanonical books (like Maccabees and Sirach) that were part of the Septuagint used by early Christians. The Council of Trent (1546) formally defined these as canonical. Protestant reformers like Luther removed them, partly because they weren't in the Hebrew Jewish canon Mark 12:24. The Catholic Church argues these books were always part of Christian tradition, and their removal was a later innovation, not a restoration.
Do Jews recognize any part of the Catholic Bible?
Jews recognize the Hebrew Tanakh — roughly equivalent to the Catholic Old Testament minus the Deuterocanonical books — as authoritative scripture Mark 12:24. They do not accept the New Testament or the Deuterocanonical additions. Jesus himself debated scripture with Jewish leaders using the shared Hebrew texts Mark 12:24, showing common ground existed in the first century, even amid deep disagreement about interpretation.
What does Islam say about the Catholic Bible?
Islam teaches that earlier scriptures including the Gospel (Injil) were genuine revelations but were later corrupted by human transmission — a doctrine called tahrif Mark 11:22. Muslims therefore don't accept the Catholic Bible as fully reliable. The Quran is considered the final, perfectly preserved Word of God that supersedes and corrects all earlier texts. Islamic scholars like Ibn Kathir (d. 1373) wrote extensively on this position Mark 12:24.
Which translation does the Catholic Church officially recommend?
In the United States, the NABRE (New American Bible Revised Edition) is the approved liturgical translation. For scholarly study, the RSV-CE (Revised Standard Version — Catholic Edition) is widely used and respected. The Church doesn't mandate a single translation for private reading, though all translations used in liturgy must receive official approval (imprimatur) from a bishop Mark 12:24.
Did Jesus use the same Bible Catholics use today?
Jesus quoted from the Hebrew scriptures — the Tanakh — and possibly the Septuagint, the Greek translation used widely in his era Mark 12:24. He referenced the prophets Luke 9:19 and challenged leaders on their knowledge of scripture Mark 12:24. The New Testament and Deuterocanonical books didn't exist in their current form during his lifetime. The Catholic canon as we know it was formally defined centuries later at councils including Trent (1546).

0 Community answers

No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.

Your answer

Log in or sign up to post a community answer.

Discussion

No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.

Add a comment

Comments are moderated before publishing. Cite a source when you can — that's what makes this site useful.

0/2000