What Are Good Questions to Ask About the Bible? A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Comparison
Judaism
"And when thy son asketh thee in time to come, saying, What mean the testimonies, and the statutes, and the judgments, which the LORD our God hath commanded you?" — Deuteronomy 6:20 (KJV) Deuteronomy 6:20
Judaism has always treated questioning as a sacred act. The Passover Seder itself is structured around four questions, and the Talmud is essentially centuries of rabbis asking and debating. Deuteronomy explicitly models the ideal posture: a child asks about the meaning of God's commandments, and the parent is expected to answer with full historical and theological context Deuteronomy 6:20. This isn't incidental — it's a commanded form of transmission.
Good questions in the Jewish framework include: What does this commandment mean for daily life? How does this passage connect to the rest of Torah? What did the rabbis of the Talmudic era say about this? The tradition of drash (interpretive inquiry) assumes every text has multiple valid layers of meaning. Deuteronomy even instructs the community to enquire, make search, and ask diligently before drawing conclusions about difficult passages Deuteronomy 13:14.
Scholars like Rabbi Joseph Soloveitchik (20th century) emphasized that intellectual wrestling with Torah is itself a form of worship. Questions about historical context, legal application, and ethical implication are all fair game. Isaiah's rhetorical challenge — Have ye not known? have ye not heard? — presupposes that the reader should already be asking foundational questions about creation and God's nature Isaiah 40:21.
Christianity
"Why askest thou me? ask them which heard me, what I have said unto them: behold, they know what I said." — John 18:21 (KJV) John 18:21
Christianity inherited Judaism's culture of scriptural inquiry and deepened it through the lens of Jesus's own teaching ministry. In Mark 9, Jesus himself initiates questioning — asking the scribes what they're debating — modeling that good questions clarify and expose assumptions Mark 9:16. Christian theologians from Augustine (4th–5th century) to N.T. Wright (contemporary) have argued that honest, rigorous questioning of scripture is essential to mature faith.
Good questions to ask about the Bible from a Christian perspective include: What is the literary genre of this passage? Who was the original audience? How does this text point to Christ? What does this mean for how I live? These questions reflect the hermeneutical principles that have guided Christian exegesis for centuries. Jesus himself, in John 18, redirected a question back to eyewitnesses — implying that firsthand testimony and community memory matter in interpretation John 18:21.
There's genuine disagreement within Christianity about how far questioning should go. Some traditions (e.g., certain evangelical schools) treat specific doctrines as beyond question, while mainline Protestant and Catholic scholars encourage historical-critical methods. Isaiah's challenge — have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth? — is often cited by Christian apologists as an invitation to ask cosmological and theological questions that the Bible itself raises Isaiah 40:21.
Islam
"Thus saith the LORD, the Holy One of Israel, and his Maker, Ask me of things to come concerning my sons, and concerning the work of my hands command ye me." — Isaiah 45:11 (KJV) Isaiah 45:11
Islam's relationship with the Bible (the Torah and Gospels, known as the Tawrat and Injil) is complex but substantive. The Quran repeatedly affirms that God sent earlier scriptures and that asking about what God has spoken is legitimate and even commanded. The prophetic tradition recorded in Jeremiah — What hath the LORD answered thee? and, What hath the LORD spoken? — resonates with the Islamic emphasis on seeking clarity about divine revelation Jeremiah 23:37. Muslim scholars ask: Is this passage preserved accurately? How does it align with Quranic teaching?
Classical Islamic scholarship, particularly figures like Ibn Hazm (11th century) and later scholars of comparative religion, encouraged Muslims to engage the Bible critically but respectfully. Good questions from an Islamic standpoint include: Does this passage affirm the oneness of God (tawhid)? Does it align with the prophethood of Muhammad as foretold? Where might textual corruption (tahrif) have occurred? These aren't dismissive questions — they're considered sincere theological inquiry.
Isaiah 45:11 — where God invites people to ask me of things to come concerning my sons — is sometimes cited in Islamic commentary as evidence that the earlier prophets pointed toward future revelation, a framework that supports asking eschatological and prophetic questions of the biblical text Isaiah 45:11. Islam agrees with Judaism and Christianity that diligent, honest inquiry into scripture is a virtue, but it frames the Bible as a partially preserved earlier revelation rather than a final, complete authority.
Where they agree
- All three traditions affirm that asking sincere questions about scripture is a spiritual virtue, not a sign of weak faith Deuteronomy 6:20.
- All three agree that diligent, careful inquiry — not casual or dismissive questioning — is the proper approach to sacred texts Deuteronomy 13:14.
- All three traditions hold that God's past acts in history are a legitimate subject of questioning and reflection Deuteronomy 4:32.
- All three recognize that prophetic speech deserves careful interrogation: what did God actually say, and what does it mean? Jeremiah 23:37
Where they disagree
| Issue | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Authority of the Biblical Text | Torah is fully authoritative and divinely given; questioning is about interpretation, not validity Deuteronomy 6:20 | Old and New Testaments together are authoritative; questions of canon were largely settled by early councils John 18:21 | Bible is a partially preserved earlier revelation; questions about textual integrity are central Isaiah 45:11 |
| Who Can Answer Scriptural Questions | Rabbinic tradition and community consensus carry great weight; individual interpretation is bounded by halakha Deuteronomy 13:14 | Varies widely — from papal authority (Catholicism) to individual conscience (Protestantism) Mark 9:16 | The Quran and authenticated Hadith serve as the final interpretive lens for any biblical question Jeremiah 23:37 |
| Scope of Permissible Questions | Nearly unlimited within the framework of Torah; even challenging God is modeled by figures like Job and Abraham Deuteronomy 4:32 | Questions of doctrine vary by denomination; some traditions limit questioning of core creeds Isaiah 40:21 | Questions that undermine tawhid (God's oneness) or prophethood are considered outside acceptable inquiry Isaiah 45:11 |
Key takeaways
- Judaism treats questioning scripture as a sacred act of transmission, modeled in Deuteronomy's parent-child dialogue (Deut. 6:20) Deuteronomy 6:20.
- Christianity follows Jesus's own example of asking clarifying questions (Mark 9:16) and redirecting inquiry to eyewitness testimony (John 18:21) Mark 9:16John 18:21.
- Islam encourages asking whether biblical passages align with Quranic teaching and divine oneness, framing the Bible as an earlier, partially preserved revelation Isaiah 45:11.
- All three faiths agree that diligent, careful inquiry — not casual dismissal — is the proper approach to difficult biblical passages Deuteronomy 13:14.
- The biggest cross-faith disagreement isn't whether to ask questions, but who has the authority to answer them and which text serves as the final interpretive standard Jeremiah 23:37.
FAQs
What's the most foundational question to ask about any Bible passage?
Is it okay to question difficult or troubling passages in the Bible?
What questions did Jesus consider worth asking?
Does Islam encourage asking questions about the Bible?
What historical questions are worth asking about the Bible?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.