What Questions to Ask When Studying the Bible: A Jewish, Christian, and Islamic Comparison
Judaism
"Then shalt thou enquire, and make search, and ask diligently; and, behold, if it be truth, and the thing certain..." — Deuteronomy 13:14 (KJV) Deuteronomy 13:14
Jewish Bible study — rooted in the rabbinic tradition of midrash and chevruta (paired learning) — treats questioning as a sacred obligation, not an optional exercise. The foundational questions are: Who is speaking? To whom? In what historical context? and What does the original Hebrew actually say? Deuteronomy commands the community to "enquire, and make search, and ask diligently" before drawing any conclusion Deuteronomy 13:14, establishing inquisitive rigor as a Torah value itself.
A second layer of questions concerns meaning across time: How did the sages interpret this passage? Where does it appear elsewhere in the Tanakh? What is the plain meaning (peshat) versus the deeper allegorical meaning (derash)? Isaiah challenges readers: "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning?" Isaiah 40:21 — implying that prior tradition and accumulated knowledge must be consulted before any new interpretation is offered.
Proverbs frames the goal of all such questioning: diligent inquiry ultimately leads to understanding "the fear of the LORD" and finding "the knowledge of God" Proverbs 2:5. Scholars like Rabbi Adin Steinsaltz (1937–2020) argued that every honest question is itself an act of worship in the Jewish framework.
Christianity
"Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me." — John 5:39 (KJV) John 5:39
Christian Bible study has historically centered on a cluster of interpretive questions shaped by the conviction that all Scripture points toward Christ. The most foundational question is: What does this passage reveal about Jesus? Jesus himself instructed, "Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me" John 5:39. This Christocentric lens means every passage — even Old Testament law and prophecy — is read with the question, How does this foreshadow or fulfill Christ?
A second critical question is deeply personal: Am I living in alignment with what I'm reading? Paul's letter to the Corinthians commands, "Examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith; prove your own selves" 2 Corinthians 13:5. This self-examination question transforms Bible study from an academic exercise into a spiritual audit. Theologians like John Calvin (1509–1564) and, more recently, Gordon Fee and Douglas Stuart in their 1981 work How to Read the Bible for All Its Worth, both stress that application questions must follow observation and interpretation.
Ephesians adds another dimension — asking what is the deeper mystery here? Paul writes that by reading carefully, believers "may understand my knowledge in the mystery of Christ" Ephesians 3:4. Practical study questions therefore include: What is the literary genre? What did the original audience understand? What is the single main point? And what must change in my life as a result?
Islam
"Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning? have ye not understood from the foundations of the earth?" — Isaiah 40:21 (KJV) Isaiah 40:21
Islam's relationship to Bible study is nuanced. Muslims regard the Torah (Tawrat) and Gospel (Injil) as originally revealed scriptures, but mainstream Islamic scholarship holds that the texts as currently preserved have undergone alteration (tahrif). When a Muslim scholar or layperson does engage the Bible, the primary question asked is: Does this passage align with or contradict Quranic teaching? This confirmatory-versus-contradictory framework shapes every other inquiry.
Within that framework, Islamic hermeneutics does share some methodological questions with Judaism and Christianity: Who is the prophet being addressed? What is the moral or legal principle being conveyed? and Does this passage point toward the oneness of God (tawhid)? Classical scholars like Ibn Hazm (994–1064) and, more recently, Ahmad Deedat (1918–2005), engaged the Bible extensively by asking where its text affirms the prophethood of Muhammad or the absolute unity of God.
The Quranic spirit of inquiry — asking whether one has truly heard and understood prior revelation — resonates with Isaiah's challenge: "Have ye not known? have ye not heard? hath it not been told you from the beginning?" Isaiah 40:21. Islam would add the follow-up question: And does what you've heard match the final, uncorrupted revelation? The goal of any such study, consistent across traditions, remains finding the knowledge of God Proverbs 2:5.
Where they agree
- All three traditions agree that sacred-text study requires diligent, active inquiry rather than surface-level reading Deuteronomy 13:14.
- All three affirm that the goal of questioning is knowledge of God, not merely intellectual satisfaction Proverbs 2:5.
- All three recognize that prior tradition and accumulated understanding must inform how questions are framed — readers are not the first to ask Isaiah 40:21.
- All three traditions include a form of self-examination as part of the study process, asking how the text applies to one's own life and conduct 2 Corinthians 13:5.
- All three treat the text as containing deeper layers of meaning that reward persistent questioning beyond the surface reading Ephesians 3:4.
Where they disagree
| Point of Disagreement | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary lens for questions | Torah and rabbinic tradition; questions filtered through halakhic and midrashic frameworks Deuteronomy 13:14 | Christocentric; every question ultimately asks what the passage reveals about Jesus John 5:39 | Quranic confirmation; questions ask whether the text aligns with the final revelation Isaiah 40:21 |
| Textual authority | The Hebrew Tanakh is authoritative; questions about the text assume its integrity | Old and New Testaments together are authoritative; questions span both Testaments Ephesians 3:4 | The Bible is viewed as partially corrupted; questions include whether a passage is original or altered Isaiah 40:21 |
| Who may ask? | Every Jew is obligated to question; communal study (chevruta) is normative Deuteronomy 13:14 | Every believer is called to examine themselves and the text 2 Corinthians 13:5 | Engagement with the Bible is generally reserved for scholars; lay Muslims are cautioned about unguided study |
| Central application question | What does this command me to do under Torah law? | How does this call me to seek first the kingdom of God? Matthew 6:33 | Does this passage affirm tawhid (the oneness of God)? |
Key takeaways
- Judaism treats diligent questioning as a Torah commandment itself, rooted in Deuteronomy's call to 'enquire, make search, and ask diligently' Deuteronomy 13:14.
- Christianity's central Bible-study question is Christocentric: 'What does this passage testify about Jesus?' — a framework Jesus himself established in John 5:39 John 5:39.
- Islam approaches the Bible by asking whether its content aligns with or contradicts the Quran, viewing the text as a prior revelation subject to verification Isaiah 40:21.
- All three traditions converge on one ultimate goal of questioning: finding the knowledge of God, as expressed in Proverbs 2:5 Proverbs 2:5.
- Self-examination is a cross-traditional study discipline — Paul's command to 'examine yourselves, whether ye be in the faith' 2 Corinthians 13:5 mirrors the Jewish and Islamic emphasis on personal accountability before the text.
FAQs
What is the most important question to ask when studying the Bible according to Christianity?
Does Judaism encourage asking questions when studying scripture?
How does Islam approach questions when studying the Bible?
What questions help uncover deeper meaning in the Bible?
What practical questions should a beginner ask when studying the Bible?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.