Why Does God Allow Evil? A Three-Faith Comparison
Judaism
"But as for you, ye thought evil against me; but God meant it unto good, to bring to pass, as it is this day, to save much people alive." — Genesis 50:20 Genesis 50:20
Jewish theology doesn't shy away from the raw tension between divine goodness and human suffering. The Hebrew Bible acknowledges that God sees human wickedness clearly — "every imagination of the thoughts of his heart was only evil continually" — yet remains sovereign over it Genesis 6:5. The tradition generally resists neat, systematic answers, preferring to wrestle with the question rather than dissolve it.
A key Jewish insight is that evil often flows from human disobedience. Daniel's prayer is instructive: the community confesses that suffering came because "we obeyed not his voice," and yet God remains righteous throughout Daniel 9:14. This covenantal framing — sin leads to consequence, repentance leads to restoration — runs through Deuteronomy, the prophets, and rabbinic literature alike. Maimonides (12th century) argued in the Guide for the Perplexed that most evil is self-inflicted by human choices, not imposed by God.
The Joseph narrative offers perhaps the most striking Jewish theodicy: what humans intend for harm, God can redirect toward good Genesis 50:20. This doesn't excuse the evil act, but it insists that God's providential purposes aren't thwarted by human malice. Proverbs reinforces that the wicked ultimately face their own mischief Proverbs 12:21, while the righteous are protected — though Jewish thinkers like Emmanuel Levinas (20th century) pushed back hard on any simplistic equation of suffering with guilt.
Christianity
"Therefore hath the LORD watched upon the evil, and brought it upon us: for the LORD our God is righteous in all his works which he doeth: for we obeyed not his voice." — Daniel 9:14 Daniel 9:14
Christian theology approaches the problem of evil through the lens of a God who doesn't merely observe suffering from a distance but enters into it. The tradition broadly distinguishes between moral evil (arising from human free will) and natural evil (suffering caused by the physical world). Augustine of Hippo (5th century) argued that evil has no independent existence — it's a privation of good, a corruption of something God made well.
Scripture affirms that human hearts are bent toward wickedness from early in the biblical narrative Genesis 6:5, and that those who devise evil err gravely Proverbs 14:22. Yet the Christian answer doesn't stop at diagnosis. The cross is presented as God's definitive response to evil: rather than simply permitting evil or punishing it from afar, God absorbs its worst consequences in Christ. Alvin Plantinga's 1974 Free Will Defense remains the most influential modern Christian philosophical response, arguing that a world with genuine free creatures capable of love necessarily permits the possibility of evil.
Christians also hold, with the Joseph story echoed in Romans 8:28, that God works providentially through evil without authoring it Genesis 50:20. The wicked will ultimately bow before the good Proverbs 14:19, and those who do unrighteously are an abomination to God Deuteronomy 25:16 — justice, Christians insist, is deferred but not abandoned. Disagreement exists between Calvinist and Arminian traditions over how much God actively ordains versus merely permits evil events.
Islam
"The evil bow before the good; and the wicked at the gates of the righteous." — Proverbs 14:19 Proverbs 14:19
Islamic theology addresses evil primarily through the doctrine of qadar (divine decree) and the concept of ibtila (trial and testing). God — Allah — is absolutely sovereign, and nothing occurs outside His knowledge or will. Yet Islamic scholars carefully distinguish between God's permissive will and His approving will: He permits evil to occur without being its moral author. The Ash'ari school (dominant in Sunni Islam since al-Ash'ari, 10th century) holds that God creates all acts, while humans acquire moral responsibility for them.
The Qur'an (2:155–157) explicitly frames suffering as a test: "We will surely test you with something of fear and hunger..." and promises that those who persevere receive God's blessing. This resonates with the biblical witness that God sees human wickedness Genesis 6:5 yet remains righteous Daniel 9:14. Evil in the world, from an Islamic perspective, serves the purpose of spiritual refinement — it reveals character, builds patience (sabr), and directs the believer back to God.
Islamic theodicy also emphasizes that apparent evil may conceal hidden good, a principle that parallels the Joseph narrative Genesis 50:20. Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah (14th century) wrote extensively in Shifa al-'Alil that divine wisdom underlies every decree, even when humans can't perceive it. Those who devise evil err and will face accountability Proverbs 14:22, while ultimate justice — including the afterlife's reckoning — ensures no evil goes unaddressed Proverbs 14:19. The tradition is frank that some questions about evil's precise purpose may exceed human comprehension in this life.
Where they agree
- All three traditions affirm that God is righteous and just even when evil appears to go unchecked Daniel 9:14.
- All three recognize that human moral corruption — hearts bent toward evil — is a primary source of suffering in the world Genesis 6:5.
- All three hold that God can and does bring good outcomes out of evil intentions and actions Genesis 50:20.
- All three teach that those who devise and practice evil ultimately face consequences, while the good prevail Proverbs 14:19 Proverbs 12:21.
- All three regard deliberate unrighteousness as deeply offensive to God's character Deuteronomy 25:16.
Where they disagree
| Issue | Judaism | Christianity | Islam |
|---|---|---|---|
| Primary cause of evil | Human disobedience to the covenant; sin breaks the relationship with God Daniel 9:14 | The Fall and free will; evil is a privation of good (Augustine) | Human weakness and forgetfulness of God; evil is part of divine testing (ibtila) |
| God's role in evil | God may bring consequences of evil upon people as righteous judgment Daniel 9:14; wrestles openly with the tension | God permits but doesn't author evil; Calvinist tradition sees stronger divine ordination | God decrees all events; humans acquire moral responsibility (Ash'ari kasb doctrine) |
| Resolution of evil | Repentance, covenantal restoration, and eschatological justice; no single atoning mechanism | Christ's atonement defeats evil's ultimate power; resurrection as final answer | Divine justice in the afterlife (akhira); no intercessory atonement — each soul answers for itself |
| Attitude toward unanswered suffering | Lament and argument with God are legitimate (Job, Psalms); Levinas resists easy theodicy | Suffering can be redemptive; Plantinga's Free Will Defense provides philosophical grounding | Submission (tawakkul) and trust in divine wisdom even when reasons are hidden (Ibn Qayyim) |
| Role of error and rulers | Evil can arise from errors of those in authority Ecclesiastes 10:5, not just individual sin | Structural and systemic evil acknowledged; social sin is a theme in liberation theology | Unjust rulers are condemned; political evil is a serious category in Islamic jurisprudence |
Key takeaways
- All three Abrahamic faiths agree that human moral corruption — hearts bent toward evil continually — is the primary engine of evil in the world (Genesis 6:5).
- Judaism, Christianity, and Islam all affirm that God can redirect evil intentions toward good outcomes, as illustrated by the Joseph narrative (Genesis 50:20).
- The biggest theological divide is over resolution: Christianity centers on Christ's atoning work, Islam on afterlife accountability, and Judaism on covenantal repentance — three distinct answers to the same anguished question.
- God's righteousness in the face of evil is a non-negotiable across all three traditions, even when the reasons for specific suffering remain opaque (Daniel 9:14).
- Scholars like Maimonides (12th c.), Augustine (5th c.), and Ibn Qayyim (14th c.) each developed sophisticated theodicies within their traditions, showing this question has driven serious intellectual engagement for over a millennium.
FAQs
Do all three religions believe God causes evil?
Can God bring good out of evil?
Does the Bible say evil will eventually be defeated?
Is suffering always a punishment for sin?
What do Judaism, Christianity, and Islam say about people who plan evil?
0 Community answers
No community answers yet. Share what you've read or learned — with sources.
Discussion
No comments yet. Be the first to share an interpretation, source, or counter-argument.